What Is the Most Popular Physics Essay Topics?

What Is the Most Popular Physics Essay Topics?Physics essays are considered as one of the best methods for those who are interested in pursuing a career in physics. These topics are also very interesting and require an intricate knowledge about the subject. Thus, these topics are suitable for those who want to pursue a career in physics.However, it is important to note that just because it is a good topic for you does not mean that it is right for all students. In fact, it is essential to check whether your favorite subject is worth studying. You may find out whether the topic that you are most interested in is right for you or not.It is obvious that if you do not study well on any of the topics then you cannot go ahead with your career in physics. The best way to find out what is right for you is to get a copy of your school's or college's catalog or plan book and read all the topics available. You can also look out for the 'choose your own topic' section. When you find out what top ics are being used by other students, you can choose to study this topic instead.At times, it is a good idea to combine two or more topics into one to make it a bigger topic. This is very useful as it allows you to pick a topic that will suit your interests better. But remember that in order to be able to combine topics, you need to make sure that you are not studying more than one topic at a time.If you want to study physics essay topics, you should also have an idea about what you are going to write about. You may decide to use quotes from physics texts or abstracts. When it comes to quotes, the major thing you need to look into is the subject's relevance to the topic. Many physics writers will provide you with tips to help you write better quotes.Also, you must remember that if you are going to write an abstract, you should ensure that it is relevant to the topic. Generally, abstracts are used to research certain topics or explain how the topic has been proved over a period of ti me. Therefore, you need to make sure that your essay is on track to the topic and has all the references necessary.One of the physics essay topics that students often consider for their assignments is the one about perpetual motion. Such topics are among the topics that are commonly used for physics assignments. Although, this is a popular topic, it is considered that it is not as easy as it seems as there are many misconceptions associated with this topic.Thus, it is advisable to have a little background knowledge about the topic before writing your physics essay topics. Remember that it is not required to have a PhD in physics before writing an essay. Once you learn about a topic well, it becomes easy for you to write an excellent essay.

Is the Kennewick Man a Caucasoid

Was Kennewick Man Caucasoid? Short answer—no, DNA analysis has resoundingly identified the 10,000-year-old skeletal remains as Native American. Long answer: with the recent DNA studies, the classification system that theoretically separated human beings into Caucasoid, Mongoloid, Australoid, and Negroid has been found to be even more error-prone than before. History of the Kennewick Man Caucasoid Controversy Kennewick Man, or more properly, The Ancient One, is the name of a skeleton discovered on a river bank in Washington state back in 1998, long before the ready availability of comparative DNA. The people who found the skeleton at first thought he was a European-American, based on a cursory look at his cranium. But the radiocarbon date put the mans death at between 8,340–9,200 calibrated years before the present (cal BP). By all known scientific understandings, this man could not have been European-American; on the basis of his skull shape he was designated Caucasoid. There are several other ancient skeletons or partial skeletons found in the Americas ranging in age from 8,000-10,000 cal BP, including Spirit Cave and Wizards Beach sites in Nevada; Hourglass Cave and Gordons Creek in Colorado; the Buhl Burial from Idaho; and some others from Texas, California, and Minnesota, in addition to the Kennewick Man materials. All of them, in varying degrees, have traits that are not necessarily what we think of as Native American; some of these, like Kennewick, were at one point tentatively identified as Caucasoid. What is Caucasoid, Anyway? To explain what the term Caucasoid means, well have to go back in time a little—say 150,000 years or so. Somewhere between 150,000 and 200,000 years ago, anatomically modern humans—known as Homo sapiens, or, rather,  Early Modern Humans (EMH)—appeared in Africa. Every single human being alive today is descended from this single population. At the time we are speaking, EMH was not the only species occupying the earth. There were at least two other hominin species: Neanderthals, and the Denisovans, first recognized in 2010, and perhaps Flores as well. There is genetic evidence that we interbred with these other species—but that is besides the point.   Isolated Bands and Geographical Variations Scholars theorize that the appearance of racial characteristics—nose shape, skin color, hair and eye color—all of that came after some EMH began to leave Africa and colonize the rest of the planet. As we spread out over the earth, little bands of us became geographically isolated and began to adapt, as humans do, to their surroundings. Little isolated bands, together adapting to their geographic surroundings and in isolation from the rest of the population, began to develop regional patterns of physical appearance, and it is at this point that races, that is, different characteristics, began to be expressed. Changes in skin color, nose shape, limb length, and overall body proportions are thought to have been a reaction to latitudinal differences in temperature, aridity, and amount of solar radiation. It is these characteristics that were used in the late 18th century to identify races. Paleoanthropologists today express these differences as geographical variation. Generally, the four major geographic variations are Mongoloid (generally considered northeastern Asia), Australoid (Australia and perhaps southeast Asia), Caucasoid (western Asia, Europe, and northern Africa), and Negroid or African (sub-Saharan Africa). Bear in mind that these are broad patterns only and that both physical traits and genes vary more within these geographical groups than they do between them. DNA and Kennewick After Kennewick Mans discovery, the skeleton was carefully examined, and, using craniometric studies, the researchers concluded that the characteristics of the cranium matched closest to those populations who make up the Circum-Pacific group, among them Polynesians, the Jomon, modern Ainu and the Moriori of the Chatham Islands. But DNA studies since then have conclusively shown that Kennewick man and the other early skeletal materials from the Americas are in fact Native American. Scholars were able to recover mtDNA, Y chromosome, and genomic DNA from Kennewick Mans skeleton, and his haplogroups are found almost exclusively among Native Aemricans—despite the physical similarities to Ainu, he is significantly closer to other Native Americans than any other group worldwide. Populating the Americas The most recent DNA studies (Rasmussen and colleagues; Raghavan and colleagues) show that the ancestors of modern Native Americans entered the Americas from Siberia via the Bering Land Bridge in a single wave beginning about 23,000 years ago. After they arrived, they spread out and diversified. By Kennewick mans time about 10,000 years later, the Native Americans had already populated the entire North and South American continents and diverged into separate branches. Kennewick man falls into the branch whose descendants spread into Central and South America. So Who is Kennewick Man? Of the five groups who have claimed him as an ancestor and were willing to provide DNA samples for comparison, the Colville tribe of Native Americans in Washington State are the closest. So why does Kennewick Man look Caucasoid? What researchers have found is that human cranial shape only matches DNA results 25 percent of the time and that the broad variability noted in the other patterns—skin color, nose shape, limb length, and overall body proportions—can also be applied to cranial characteristics. Bottom line? Kennewick man was a Native American, descended from Native Americans, ancestral to Native Americans. Sources Meltzer DJ. 2015. Kennewick Man: coming to closure. Antiquity 89(348):1485-1493.Raff JA. 2015. Genome of the Ancient One (a.k.a. Kennewick Man). Human Biology 87(2):132-133.Raghavan M, Steinrà ¼cken M, Harris K, Schiffels S, Rasmussen S, DeGiorgio M, Albrechtsen A, Valdiosera C, à vila-Arcos MC, Malaspinas A-S et al. 2015. Genomic evidence for the Pleistocene and recent population history of Native Americans. Science 349(6250).Rasmussen M, Sikora M, Albrechtsen A, Korneliussen TS, Moreno-Mayar JV, Poznik GD, Zollikofer CPE, Ponce de Leà ³n MS, Allentoft ME, Moltke I et al. 2015. The ancestry and affiliations of Kennewick Man. Nature 523:455.

A Christmas Carol Analysis - 1141 Words

Charles wrote A Christmas Carol in 1843. This short novel has a Christmas theme and has been popular since it was first published. This moral story is about an old man called Scrooge who hates Christmas and is mean to everyone, but he is transformed. The lessons he learns are as much for the reader to benefit from as Scrooge. His transformation is the key event in the novel and the reader clearly sees Scrooge before and after his experiences. This process will now be explored more fully. A Christmas Carol, by Charles Dickens When we first meet Scrooge he is described as a cold-hearted, selfish, evil man. He was a Tight-fisted hand at the grindstone, A squeezing, wrenching, grasping, scraping, clutching, covetous old sinner!. He is†¦show more content†¦I think Dickens created this character to show that Scrooge deliberately avoids friendly human contact. Dickens includes the visit of the portly gentlemen to show just how mean and selfish Scrooge is. Even though Scrooge is rich he wont even give a penny to the poor. The portly gentlemen are there to collect money for the poor and homeless. One portly gentleman says people are suffering and are freezing in the cold. Scrooge asks whether prisons and Union workhouses are still in operation? and slyly jokes Oh! I was afraid, from what you said at first, that something had occurred to stop them in their useful course. Scrooge knows that this is a way out of giving money to the poor. The reader cant help but get the impression that these are ready excuses. Finally one portly gentleman asked how much he should put him down for, and Scrooge simply says nothing. Scrooges reaction to these gentlemen after his transformation will contrast greatly. Scrooge treats his clerk Bob Cratchit very badly. His working conditions are poor, a dismal little cell with very little heat. Scrooge complains the clerk has no right to have every 25th December off and that it is really picking a mans pocket. Yet Scrooge grudgingly allows the day off but says be here all the earlier theShow MoreRelatedA Christmas Carol Analysis1036 Words   |  5 PagesCharles Dickens’s main character in â€Å"A Christmas Carol†. This play is about the story of a man, Ebenezer Scrooge, who was greedy, loved money, and had a heart that was hardened toward Christmas. Charles Dickens wrote this story to help expose the suffering of the poor and to convince readers that conditions need to be corrected. Through the visitations of three spirits, Scrooge learned why he had become greedy, how much he had missed out on by avoiding Christmas, and that he was capable of becomingRead MoreA Christmas Carol Analysis1409 Words   |  6 PagesThe novels A Christmas Carol, by Charles Dickens, and Wuthering Heights, by Emily Bronte display a strong parallel in the ways in which they use the ir different styles of narration in the story to reveal the true inner-feelings of characters. In A Christmas Carol, the main character, Ebenezer Scrooge, is taught many valuable lessons through the testament of three different spirits, each working to bring out the true emotions of this man. Likewise, in Wuthering Heights, the main character, Mr. LockwoodRead MoreChristmas Carol Analysis679 Words   |  3 PagesCesar Granda E.G 121 When reading A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens you realize that Scrooge’s childhood has a huge impact on his adult life, his adult self is a mirror image of his child self, both in his emotions and relationships. This becomes apparent when the ghost of Christmas past appears and takes Scrooge on a journey back into his childhood days. His childhood really molds Scrooge into the person he becomes later in life. Scrooge was a lonely and withdrawn child becauseRead MoreA Christmas Carol Analysis1123 Words   |  5 PagesWhile Charles Dickens’ novel, A Christmas Carol, gives an account of one wealthy man’s insight towards the lower class, Steven Johnson’s work, Ghost Map, explores the hardships endured by the lower class in Soho, a poor area of London in the 1850’s. The two pieces of literature work in conjunction to examine how the quality of life during these times was affected by the disparity between classes. Ebenezer Scrooge, the protagonist in A Christmas Carol, demonstrates early in the novel how the richRead MoreA Christmas Carol Analysis707 Words   |  3 PagesA Christmas Carol Discussion By Kalana A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens is a story about a man who is stingy, rude and solitary. His name is Scrooge, and he gets taught many lessons. Scrooge comes out a changed man who is optimistic and happy. The lessons he gets taught is not only for him but also for Dickens readers. Throughout this text, there many situations where usual readers can relate to. In other parts of the text, there are moments that are rare and have a massive impact on ScroogesRead MoreThe Christmas Carol Character Analysis1006 Words   |  5 Pages During the book â€Å"The Christmas Carol† by Charles Dickens, Ebenezer Scrooge changed very much, during the beginning of the book he was a cold hearted person but by the end of the book he was a jolly old man. The Christmas Carol started off with Scrooge at his business partner, Marley, funeral. It said that: â€Å"And even Scrooge was not so dreadfully cut up by the sad event, but that he was an excellent man of business on the very day of the funeral, and solemnised it with an undoubted bargain.† ScroogeRead More Analysis of A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens Essays3690 Words   |  15 PagesAnalysis of A Christmas Carol by Charles Dickens A Christmas Carol is a novel written by Charles Dickens (1812-1870) during the Victorian age, an era that took its name from Queen Victoria, England titular ruler from 1819-1901. Under Queen Victoria’s rule, London reigned the worlds dominate city country and the country’s incomparable center of commerce, culture and government. At this time London’s industrial age contributed to a large share of the manpower and capital that brought theRead MoreAnalysis Of A Christmas Carol By Charles Dickens1395 Words   |  6 PagesMore than Just a Novel for the Christmas Season Christmas, the most joyous season of the year for many Christians. Yet, in the early Victorian era many industry and business leaders started to emerge as people who lacked the spirit of giving of kindness, particularly around Christmas. Charles Dickens, in eighteen forty-three penned a novel that to this day is one of the most beloved books of the Christmas season. Many view the book only as a seasonal novel to read as a young child or even an adultRead MoreCharacter Analysis Of Scrooge In A Christmas Carol1524 Words   |  7 PagesDicken’s A Christmas Carol is a stubborn character that insists on his lone, grumpy life. His outlook on life had been skewed ever since his beautiful fiancà © Belle left him after she saw his love of money and wealth only growing. Scrooge lost the love of his life to greed yet he still holds tightly to it. Although many in his life have extended a warm hand to show him love and kindness, he has rejected it coldly. As Scrooge’s narcissist ic and selfish attitude only grow with time, three Christmas ghostsRead MoreAnalysis Of Oliver Twist, A Christmas Carol, And A Tale Of Two Cities2379 Words   |  10 Pagesunknowingly sparked the social changes in nineteenth century London by exposing the harsh conditions of the lower class through the life of an innocent child. Charles Dickens, born February 7, 1812, wrote many classic novels including Oliver Twist, A Christmas Carol, and A Tale of Two Cities. Dickens grew up in a lower class family, because of that his father, John Dickens, was arrested and put in jail for debt when Charles was twelve years old. Soon after this, Dickens had to stop school and go into work

East Of Eden Essay Prompts Example For Students

East Of Eden Essay Prompts Growing up and change is a very important role in a person’s life. Everyday people do this, some for the better and others for the worse. In the movie East of Eden, Aaron is the son that changes for the worse. He becomes a drunk and leaves for a war he doesn’t believe in. As for Abra she takes on the role of support for Cal and his father, Adam. She is the glue for the bond that forms between them. But she soon realizes that the better she knows Cal, the more she starts to fall in love with him. Cal shows a remarkable turnaround from being the evil unloved son, to being the one that is there for his father while he is on his deathbed. All three of these characters show a form of change in growing up. We all have the ability to grow up, some just take advantage of this opportunity. The key is how you decide to grow up. Either for the better, like Cal, or the downside, like Aaron did. Aaron is the only character who shows a reversal, going from the good son with sweet gir lfriend to a drunken fool. It might have been for shadowed by the way he showed his love to Abra, it was a false love. He was with her because that is whom he was supposed to be with. It didn’t seem he had deep emotions for her. Then in the end she leaves him for Cal, who she has, fell in love with. Aaron also lived in a closed world, not open for new ideas. When he was told that his mom was dead, that is what he believed and never questioned it. So when he found out that she was alive and a whore, his whole perfect world came crashing down. Aaron goes out and drinks a lot of alcohol and smashes his head threw a train window. He couldn’t except the truth about his own family. Aaron’s life is almost tragic; he had everything going for him. Then, in a day’s time, he has lost it all. One of the most significant characters is Abra. Abra starts out as this innocent unaware girlfriend of Aaron and winds up being one of the main ingredients in Cal and Adam’s coming together. She goes from saying that Cal â€Å"is the bad son† and that â€Å"he scares me† to being the one who falls in love with him. She believes cal is the bad son but she realizes, as a sign of growing up, that all he really needs is love and that she is attracted to him. Abra is also the one that talks to Adam telling him that he needs to tell Cal that he loves him. She shows a lot of maturity by doing this. The person who shows the most change is Cal goes from bad boy outcast to taking care of his father. Cal tries to buy his father’s love the whole movie but not till the end when his father is dying does he realize that’s not how you get some one to love you. At the beginning Cal is labeled the bad boy, but not until and with the help of Abra, does he grow out and sees what a real person he can be. Only when he is beside his father’s bed and he finally hears his father say he loves him, does he achieve one of his greatest accomplishments, receiving his father’s love. Cal has now reach a high point on growing up. Growing up is a part of life. Some do it more than others do though. Throughout the movie all the characters grow up and change. Cal changed for the better and Aaron didn’t, Abra was the one in between trying to help. Like a fork in the road, there is a path for everyone to choose, whether it is good or bad.

Polyphemus Essays - Odyssey, Cyclopes, Polyphemus, Odysseus, Cyclops

Polyphemus Polyphemus according to Greek mythology was the son of Poseidon and the nymph-thoosa. In all of my research on Polyphemus I have found that he has no powers, nor does he have symbols. But besides his enormous size and his herding of goats and sheep. He has no other powers and symbols The Cyclopes definition means round eye. A mythical semi-human monster of huge proportions. A single eye at the center of his forehead. Usually described as one round-eyed giant. Polyphemus is best remembered in homers poem The Odyssey when Polyphemus captures Odysseus and his crew on their way home from the Trojan War. His crew lands on the Island of Cyclopes in search of Provisions. After finding polythemuses cave and went inside to steal food and he also was curious to see what a Cyclopes looks like he had never seen one before. So Odysseus and his men hid waiting for the Cyclopes to return. When he returned Odysseus and his men gasped in disbelief. Giving away their hiding place. So polythemus closes his cave with a big boulder, after he trapped him Odysseus told the Cyclopes that his name was nobody. His biggest problem was the he and his men could not lift the boulder therefore they can not kill polythemus. So polythemus ended up eating 4 of his men total since they like raw meat it doesnt matter what kind just as long as it is raw. And after that polythemus goes for a walk around the island with his flock of sheep when he was gone Odysseus put a sharpened log into poop to hide it. Upon his return polythemus drinks wine that Odysseus gave him, what he doesnt know is that the wine he drank is very powerful that a Greek god gave him. So from that point Polythemus passes out. From that point Odysseus and his men take the spear and drop it in his eye Putting him in a panic. Looking for Odysseus and his men lifts up the boulder and waits at the door. So Odysseus and his men cling to the bottom of the sheep escaping from polythemus. Then polythemus shouts and pounds so the other cylopses come to his call and they ask what is the matter and he says that I am blined by nobody. And they say then what is wrong and polythemus says, no I was blinded by nobody. So they leave him alone at that point. Theater Essays

Free Essays on The Bear

â€Å"The Bear† By William Faulkner William Faulkner makes extensive use of setting and themes in the story â€Å"The Bear†. The most important idea of Faulkner’s are the relationship of man to nature, the brutal racial conflict at the heart of southern life, and the nature of inheritance, which specifically deals with the property and characteristics, particularly as passed down from father to son. The idea of nature relates the impact on the pathway of individual life and on the public, cultural society at that period of time. Faulkner’s most intense, focused, and symbolic exploration of the relationship of man and nature are the characteristics of stories in which every action is connected to nature; it is hard to control Mother Nature. He also makes use of the animals to represent the values held by the main characters and to reflect the state of mind of the characters. Old Ben, the legendary bear, is the symbol of the power and inscrutability of nature. â€Å"He is nearly immortal, nearly invulnerable, capable of overpowering virtually anything, and capable of wreaking havoc on human settlements and establishments†(P.212). The men, who put their mind to work on the single purpose of hunting him, are in a way representative of man’s drive to control nature. Old Ben represents the nobility of the â€Å"Old South† and is described as â€Å"fierce and ruthless not just to stay alive but ruthless with the fierce pride of liberty and freedom, jealous and proud enough of libe rty and freedom to see it threatened not with fear nor even alarm but almost with joy†(P. 447). The bear is a virtually mythic force, and only over the course of year are the men able to bring him down. Faulkner uses the wood in which the main action of the story takes place, the animals in those woods, and the historical setting of his novel represent the values held by main characters. The hunting of the bear takes place in the woods in Mississippi ... Free Essays on The Bear Free Essays on The Bear â€Å"The Bear† By William Faulkner William Faulkner makes extensive use of setting and themes in the story â€Å"The Bear†. The most important idea of Faulkner’s are the relationship of man to nature, the brutal racial conflict at the heart of southern life, and the nature of inheritance, which specifically deals with the property and characteristics, particularly as passed down from father to son. The idea of nature relates the impact on the pathway of individual life and on the public, cultural society at that period of time. Faulkner’s most intense, focused, and symbolic exploration of the relationship of man and nature are the characteristics of stories in which every action is connected to nature; it is hard to control Mother Nature. He also makes use of the animals to represent the values held by the main characters and to reflect the state of mind of the characters. Old Ben, the legendary bear, is the symbol of the power and inscrutability of nature. â€Å"He is nearly immortal, nearly invulnerable, capable of overpowering virtually anything, and capable of wreaking havoc on human settlements and establishments†(P.212). The men, who put their mind to work on the single purpose of hunting him, are in a way representative of man’s drive to control nature. Old Ben represents the nobility of the â€Å"Old South† and is described as â€Å"fierce and ruthless not just to stay alive but ruthless with the fierce pride of liberty and freedom, jealous and proud enough of libe rty and freedom to see it threatened not with fear nor even alarm but almost with joy†(P. 447). The bear is a virtually mythic force, and only over the course of year are the men able to bring him down. Faulkner uses the wood in which the main action of the story takes place, the animals in those woods, and the historical setting of his novel represent the values held by main characters. The hunting of the bear takes place in the woods in Mississippi ...

Basic Argument for Fatalism

He thinks it is not up to him what will happen a thousand years hence, next year, tomorrow, or the very next moment. † (52) â€Å"A fatalist thinks of the future in the way we all think of the past, for everyone is a fatalist as he looks back on things. † (52) We all think of the past â€Å"as something settled and fixed, to be taken for what it is. We are never in the least tempted to try to modify it. It is not in the least up to us what happened last year, yesterday, or even a moment ago, any more than are the motions of the heaves or the political developments in Tibet. We say of past things that they are no longer within our power. The fatalist says they never were. † (52-53) Theological Fatalism According to the main versions of Western Monotheism (e. g. traditional Christianity), God is omniscient. To be omniscient is to have (in some important sense) unlimited knowledge. It’s hard to say what this amounts to, but let’s use the following defin ition (since it’s common) x is omniscient = for x knows every true proposition and x does not believe any false propositions. Many people think that omniscience is incompatible with human freedom, because it implies the doctrine of theological fatalism. Theological fatalism is the view that all human actions are unavoidable (and we are powerless to do anything other than what we actually do) because God has exhaustive foreknowledge of all future human actions. Here is an important statement of the argument for theological fatalism from Augustine (On Free Choice of the Will, Book III) I very much wonder how God can have foreknowledge of everything in the future, and yet we do not sin by necessity. It would be an irreligious and completely insane attack on God’s foreknowledge to say that something could happen otherwise than as God foreknew †¦ Since God foreknew that [Adam] was going to sin, his sin necessarily had to happen. How, then, is the will free when such inescapable necessity is found in it? Surely this is the problem †¦ How is it that these two propositions are not contradictory and inconsistent: (1) God has foreknowledge of everything in the future; and (2) We sin by the will, not by necessity? For, you say, if God foreknows that someone is going to sin, then it is necessary that he sin. But if it is necessary, the will has no choice about whether to sin; there is an inescapable and fixed necessity. And so you fear that this argument forces us into one of two positions: either we draw the heretical conclusion that God does not foreknow everything in the future; or, if we cannot accept this conclusion, we must admit that sin happens by necessity and not by will. The Basic Argument for Theological Fatalism Where S stands for any person whatsoever and A stands for any action, Augustine’s argument can be stated as: 1. For any person, S, and an action, A, that S performs, God knew in advance that S will do A. 2. If God knows in advance that S will do A, then it necessary that S will do A. 3. Therefore, it is necessary that S will do A. 4. If it is necessary that S will do A, then S is not free to refrain from performing A. 5. If S is not free to refrain from performing A, then S does not freely perform A. 6. Therefore, no person ever acts freely. Evaluating the argument Premise 2 is ambiguous †¢P2a: Necessarily, If God knows in advance that S will perform A, then S will perform A (De Dicto) †¢P2b: If God knows in advance that S will perform A, then necessarily S will perform A (De Re) P2a is true but the resulting argument is invalid P2a is true. It says that the proposition â€Å"if God knows in advance that S will perform A, then S will perform A† is necessarily true and this just means that it is impossible for God to know in advance that, for example, I will raise my arm at some time and I fail to raise my arm at that time. We can put this by saying that God’s knowing in advance that I will raise my arm at some time logically entails that I will raise my arm at that time. P2a is a way of expressing this truth. The resulting argument is invalid. Using P2a as the key premise, the argument is: 1. Necessarily, if God knows in advance that S will perform A, then S will perform A. 2. God knows in advance that S will perform A. 3. Therefore, necessarily, S will perform A. But this argument is invalid (the conclusion doesn’t follow from the premises). We can show this by means of a counterexample (an argument of the same form with true premises and a false conclusion). The form of this argument is: 1. Necessarily, If p, then p. 2. P 3. Therefore, necessarily q. To see that the argument is invalid, use the following substitutions: p = K. Sharpe weighs over 200lbs, q = K. Sharpe weighs over 199lbs. . Necessarily, If K. Sharpe weighs over 200lbs, then K. Sharpe weighs over 199lbs. 2. K. Sharpe weighs over 200lbs 3. Therefore, necessarily K. Sharpe weighs over 199lbs. The premises of this argument are true but the conclusion is obviously false (I could go on a diet and successfully lose some weight). I weigh over 199lbs but not essentially. I could weigh less than 199lbs and, i n fact, I did weigh less than 199lbs at one point. All that follows from the first two premises is that, in fact, I in fact weight more than 199lbs. It doesn’t follow that it is impossible for me to weigh less than 199lbs. Just in case you are not convinced, here is a second counterexample (Plantinga’s) 1. Necessarily, if I know that George Clooney is a bachelor, then George Clooney is a bachelor. 2. I know that George Clooney is a bachelor. 3. Therefore, it is necessarily true that George Clooney is a bachelor Again, the premises are true but the conclusion is false. George Clooney is a bachelor but he is not essentially a bachelor. He could get married, he just chooses not to. All that follows from the first two premises is that George Clooney is in fact a bachelor (not that he is essentially a bachelor). P2b renders the argument valid but it is obviously false 1. If God knows in advance that S will perform A, then necessarily S will perform A. 2. God knows in advance that S will perform A. 3. Therefore, necessarily S will perform A. This argument is valid (it’s just modus ponens) and so if the premises were true then conclusion would be true as well. But P2b is false. Given the de re reading of P2b, it says that whatever propositions God knows are necessarily true or, to put the point in terms of properties, if God knows that some object has a property then the object has that property essentially. Taken in this way, P2b is obviously false (nor does it follow from omniscience). Since the basic argument has to rely on either P2a or P2b, the argument is either invalid or relies on a false premise. Either way it’s unsound. Here is a way of thinking about this criticism of the argument. From the fact that God knows that Paul will mow his yard on July 7, 2015 it follows that, on July 7 2015, Paul mows his yard and that he does not refrain from mowing his yard on that day. But, it does not follow that it is metaphysically impossible for Paul to refrain from mowing his yard that day (that Paul does not refrain from mowing and it is impossible that Paul refrain from mowing are two very different things). All that follows from the fact that God knows in advance that Paul will mow is that Paul will not exercise his power to refrain not that he lacks the power the power to refrain. The basic argument for theological fatalism needs the later inference, but that inference is not a good one. Thus, the basic argument fails.